391 posts
Xano's entry plan costs more than three times Supabase Pro. That gap isn't about capacity — it's about who builds the backend, and whether they write code.
Convex charges $25 per developer. Supabase charges $25 per project. Same number, completely different bill — and a $2,500 minimum waiting at Convex's next tier.
Both are Postgres. Only one is a backend platform. Neon sells metered compute that costs nothing while idle; Supabase sells auth, storage and realtime alongside the database.
Antigravity is free for individual developers. Claude Code requires a paid Claude plan. The interesting question is what the free tier's rate limits cost you in practice.
Windsurf's pricing page now redirects to Devin and Windsurf isn't named there. Before comparing features, establish which product you would actually be buying.
Windsurf's pricing page now redirects to Devin, and Windsurf isn't named there. That changes this comparison before any feature enters it — here is what we found.
Codex comes bundled with a ChatGPT subscription from $8. Cursor is a purpose-built agentic IDE at $20. Both free to try — the real cost is switching editors.
Copilot can run Claude models and delegate to Claude as an agent, so this is less either/or than it looks. What each actually costs, and where they really differ.
Gumloop bills AI agent runs by model, tool calls and compute. n8n bills one flat execution per workflow. For deterministic work the gap is roughly twentyfold.
n8n charges once per workflow run. Make charges per module action. Complexity favours n8n, high frequency favours Make — here is where the line actually falls.